USPTO serial 78150735
IRGATEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 2006
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with IRGATEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUDWIGSHAFEN, DE
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Tarrytown, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Tarrytown, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Tarrytown, NY, US
Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen S. Simpson
Ellen S. Simpson Colson Law Group5555 Main StreetBuffalo, NY 14221United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used as co-catalyst for regulating the polymerization of thermoplastics in the polymer manufacturing industry; chemicals used as oxidation catalyst for oxidation processes as needed for intermediates or final chemicals in the fine chemical industry; chemicals used in unprocessed plastics industry, namely monomer stabilizer to prevent clogging during distillation or hardening during storage of monomers or formulations thereof, controlled molecular weight modifier or cross linker of thermoplastics | ACTIVE | Nov 3, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASF SE
- Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named IRGATEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |