USPTO serial 78151017
PCQI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PCQI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pacific Palisades, CA
Pacific Palisades, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent A. Sireci
VINCENT A SIRECI CO/TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION FOR USE BY PHYSICIAN-BASED MEDICAL PRACTICES, HOSPITALS, OR OTHER HEALTH CARE DELIVERY SYSTEMS FOR GATHERING PATIENT DATA PRIMARILY FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING THE QUALITY OF PATIENT, ASSESSING PATIENT SYMPTOMS, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS, ASSESSING PATIENT UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR MEDICAL CONDITION AND TREATMENT AND OF APPROPRIATE HEALTH CARE PREVENTION MEASURES, ASSESSING PATIENT COMPLIANCE WITH TREATMENT, ASSESSING PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH MEDICAL CARE, AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PATIENT CARE THROUGH EMPOWERING AN EDUCATING PATIENTS, THROUGH ENHANCING PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION, AND BY PROVIDING FEEDBACK TO PHYSICIANS AND HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATORS, WITH SUCH PATIENT DATA COMPRISING, IN PART, INFORMATION PROVIDED BY PATIENTS IN RESPONSE TO SPECIFIC MEDICALLY-ORIENTED QUERIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |