USPTO serial 78151349
ONEOFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONEOFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Necklaces, bracelets, earrings, rings, brooches, pendants, tie-pins, cuff links; watches and clocks, watch bands, watch cases; lighters for smokers, cigar and cigarette holders, cigar and cigarette cases, ashtrays, cigar lighters, cigar cutters, match cases and holders, mouthpieces, tobacco jars, all of precious metal or coated therewith. | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | TOBACCO, CIGARS AND CIGARETTES, ASHTRAYS, CIGAR AND CIGARETTE CASES, CIGARS AND CIGARETTE HOLDERS, MATCH BOXES AND HOLDERS, CIGARETTE AND CIGAR LIGHTERS ALL NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL; MATCHES, CIGAR CUTTERS, TOBACCO JARS AND POUCHES; PIPES AND PIPE CLEANERS; MOUTHPIECES, NAMELY CIGARETTE HOLDERS AND STEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |