USPTO serial 78151444
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hook, Hampshire, GB
Hook, Hampshire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for computer security purposes, namely, anti-virus and firewall software, electronic databases of approved and safe web sites that are suitable for browsing by minors, and software for blocking unwanted pop-up windows; software for controlling and limiting access to computer systems, computer utility software, software to prevent access to data by hackers; software to enable the secure storage of data; encryption software; software to enable the creation and sending of encrypted e-mails; software to enable the permanent deletion of data from computers; hard disk-drive maintenance and management software; web browser content monitoring, filtering and blocking software; file management software for creating, reading and maintaining data files for use in multiple computer architectures; file content monitoring software, namely, computer software to monitor the content of computer files; data storage and retrieval software; computer software to back-up computer data, including computer software that can back up computer data by accessing the data via the internet; computer systems security audit software, namely, computer software that automatically performs an audit to assess the security of computer software programs; computer anti-theft software, namely, computer software to prevent theft of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of information technology; computer systems analysis and consultancy; computer programming services for others; computer software design for others; updating of computer software for others; performing audits to assess the degree of security of the computer system of others; recovery of computer data; creating and maintaining websites for others; hosting the websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |