USPTO serial 78151719
PEAT MARWICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEAT MARWICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1185 MC Amstelveen, NL
1185 MC Amstelveen, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karin Segall
KARIN SEGALL AND JOSEPH R ROBINSON DARBY & DARBY, PCPOST OFFICE BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines, books and pamphlets relating to accounting, auditing tax business advice and management consulting | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Accountancy, internal and external auditing, book-keeping, business research, the provision of commercial and business information, cost analysis and consultancy services relating thereto; business management assistance and advice; secretarial, business efficiency and marketing consultancy services; personnel management, selection and recruitment, outplacement services; advisory services relating to mergers, acquisitions, franchising and business liquidations; tax investigation, tax advice, preparation of tax returns; management consultancy services namely business management, organizational planning and development, project advice, business risk management, information risk management, process management; corporate finance namely advice relating to business sales and acquisitions; forensic accounting; consulting in the field of business insolvency; placing advertisements for others; business consulting services in the field of internal reorganization and restructuring; market research and market studies; providing information in the field of business management and business administration via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Advisory services relating to credit and debit control, investment, grants and financing of loans; pension services, namely, advice and administration relating to employee and corporate pension plans; real estate and property management; financing of real estate and of property development; customs brokerage; consultancy and advisory services relating to financial matters and to taxation; corporate finance namely advising on financial affairs, financial evaluation and financial consultancy; banking services; stock exchange price quotation; actuarial services; financial risk management; debt collecting agency services; fiscal assessments; providing information in the fields of insurance, financial affairs, and real estate affairs via a global computer network; consulting services relating to corporate initial public offerings and investigations of businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KPMG International
- Other trademarks owned by KPMG International
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named PEAT MARWICK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |