USPTO serial 78151947
PICKLE-O'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICKLE-O'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Reno, NV
WICHITA, KS
WICHITA, KS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Ferretti
JOSEPH J FERRETTI CROWE & DUNLEVY, PC1800 MID-AMERICA TWR 20 N BROADWAOKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fried pickles for consumption on or off premises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of America's Drive-In Trust, a Pennsylvania Business Trust, comprising Ronald L. Matlock and Janice C. George, all United States Citizens
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named PICKLE-O'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |