Drawing for JUST ENOUGH

USPTO serial 78152425

JUST ENOUGH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUST ENOUGH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD H. KRUMHOLZ

ARNOLD H KRUMHOLZ LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005ANTIBIOTIC, ANTI-ITCH, ANTI-FUNGAL, ANTI-INFLAMMATORY, ANALGESICS AND ANTI-ALLERGY TOPICAL CREAMS, OINTMENTS, AND GELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance