USPTO serial 78152830
GOODMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2936007Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent D. Sanders
K. Hov IP, Inc.110 West Front StreetRed Bank, NJ 07701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Real estate development and residential real estate building construction; real estate site selection; construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of residential buildings; land development services, namely, planning and laying out of residential communities | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by K. HOV IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by K. HOV IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by K. HOV IP, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named GOODMAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |