USPTO serial 78153289
WINDCHILL DYNAMICDESIGNLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINDCHILL DYNAMICDESIGNLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas V. Smurzynski
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD, LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer education training services relating to computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Parametric Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Parametric Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WINDCHILL DYNAMICDESIGNLINK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |