USPTO serial 78154197
LIGSORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIGSORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH ST - 6TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water treatment chemicals for industrial use for cleaning wastewater, drinking water and industrial water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Noram Engineering and Constructors Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Noram Engineering and Constructors Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named LIGSORB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |