Drawing for M

USPTO serial 78155549

M

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with M?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Spoor Gard

AMANDA PECCHIONI THOMPSON BARNES & THORNBURG11 S MERIDIAN STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for the detection, blocking, filtering and modification of unsolicited, bulk, and junk electronic messages; computer security software for use in securing and encrypting data stored on personal digital assistants, for use in controlling and limiting access to on-line databases containing escrow accounts information; firewall software for protecting computer systems from unauthorized access and use; computer software for network management, protection and recovery from computer viruses, copy protection, transferring data between portable computer devices and desktop and networked computers, and for linking text records with electronic images; computer utility and antivirus software; computer software for allowing electronic mail and online communications and messaging; computer communications software for connecting local area networks, internal corporate networks, and file and proxy servers; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 19, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 19, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 19, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 29, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance