USPTO serial 78155768
ONBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimbley L. Muller
KIMBLEY L MULLER OSP 4794SHELL OIL COMPANY910 LOUISIANAHOUSTON, TX 77002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical agents for testing oil and lubricants, namely testing the water content of oil and its viscosity | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | apparatus and equipment for testing oil and lubricants, namely a portable kit comprised of test tubes and a pump | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | instructional manuals and booklets relating to the testing of oils and lubricants, namely, testing the water content of oil and its viscosity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |