Drawing for BIKRAM HOT YOGA

USPTO serial 78156037

BIKRAM HOT YOGA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIKRAM HOT YOGA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirt S. O'Neill

KIRT S ONEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and teaching training in the fields of yoga instruction, yoga philosophy, yoga theory and practice, allopathic physical systems, integration of medical and yogic systems, yoga therapy, marketing of yoga instruction, physical fitness, meditation, mental training and discipline, and health, and distributing course materials in connection therewith, in International Class 41.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 8, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 8, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 30, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 9, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance