USPTO serial 78156351
TELEVITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TELEVITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and manuals supplied therewith; computer software for use in collecting, analyzing and storing real-time physiological data and information from medical devices, sensors and other electronic devices that generate some kind of output, and for transmitting such data and information via local, wide area and global computer networks for patient assessment, monitoring and treatment; computer software that enables the user to monitor, control and operate medical devices and other electronic devices remotely via local, wide area and global computer networks; and manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, application service provider, featuring software for use in collecting, analyzing, and storing real-time physiological data and information from medical devices, sensors and other electronic devices that generate some kind of output, and for transmitting such data and information via local, wide area and global computer networks for patient assessment, monitoring and treatments, and software that enables the user to monitor, control and operate medical devices and other electronic devices remotely via local, wide area and global computer networks; computer services, namely, application service provider, namely, hosting computer software applications for others; computer software design for others; development of custom and pre-packaged software for others; computer consultation; technical consultation in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support services, namely, providing troubleshooting in the field of computer hardware and software via telephone and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing medical information gathered from medical devices, sensors and other electronic devices that generate medical data from computer databases to others via local, wide area and global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |