USPTO serial 78156539
STAZ TIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STAZ TIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Liquid soaps for hands, face and body, Body cream, Deodorant soap, Deodorants and antiperspirants; Baby lotion, Age retardant lotion, Bath lotion, Body mask cream, Body mask lotion, Body mask powder, Body masks, Aromatherapy oils, Essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HAIR COMBS; NON ELECTRIC TOOTH BRUSHES | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, TOPS, PANTS, JACKETS, SHORTS, HATS, HEADWARMERS, SPORTSWEAR, AND ACTIVEWEAR, NAMELY, SWEATBANDS, T-SHIRTS, BOOTS, SHOES, GYM SHOES, SLIPPERS, SANDALS, JOGGING SHOES, TANK TOPS, BOXER SHORTS, GYM SHORTS SWEAT SHORTS, SWEAT PANTS, WARM-UP SUITS, LEGGINGS SOCKS, ATHLETIC UNIFORMS UNDERWEAR AND SOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Trisha
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Trisha
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Cameron
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Cameron
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named STAZ TIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |