Drawing for INTEGRAL

USPTO serial 78156783

INTEGRAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTEGRAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana Brody-Brown

Dana Brody-Brown Lewis and Roca LLP2440 W. El Camino Real, 6th FloorMountain View, CA 94040-1499UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY SEMICONDUCTORS, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY MODULES, MICROPROCESSORS, MICROCONTROLLERS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 28, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance