USPTO serial 78156964
CAE MESOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAE MESOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia C. Weber
CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GRAPHIC COMPUTERS AND IMAGE GENERATORS AND IMAGE DISPLAY FOR USE IN THE FIELDS OF MULTI-DIMENSIONAL VISUALIZATION AND SIMULATION, DATA VISUALIZATION, SIMULATION, TRAINING, SYSTEM DESIGN AND SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTER COMPONENTS, COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, NAMELY, GRAPHIC COMPONENTS AND COMPUTERS AND IMAGE GENERATION AND VISUALIZATION HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT DATABASE LIBRARIES, DATABASE MODELING WORKSTATIONS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF IMAGE GENERATION AND IMAGE DISPLAY AND SIMULATION; COMPONENTS AND COMPUTERS FOR GENERATION, ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS AND DATABASES; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, COMPUTER COMPONENTS, COMPUTER EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |