USPTO serial 78156975
CAE STRATOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAE STRATOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Epstein
CYNTHIA C WEBER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for graphic computers and image generators and image display for use in the fields of multi-dimensional visualization and simulation, data visualization, simulation, training, system design and system architecture; computer peripherals; computer components, computer equipment and systems, namely, graphic components and computers and image generation and visualization hardware and software, virtual environment database libraries, database modeling workstations for use in the field of image generation and image display and simulation; components, namely, graphic processing chips, graphic cards, circuit boards and integrated circuits; computers for generation, analysis and management of virtual evironments and databases; integrated circuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, computer components, namely, grahpic processing chips, graphic cards, circuit boards and integrated circuits; computer equipment and systems, and integrated circuits for others; computer programming services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |