Drawing for ECO-CHALLENGE

USPTO serial 78156991

ECO-CHALLENGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO-CHALLENGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jane Shay Wald

JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVE OF THE STARSSTE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Luggage; all purpose sport bags and bags, namely carry-on, clutch, duffel, tote, and travel, garment bags, beach bags, briefcases, card cases, coin purses, fanny packs, knapsacks, backpacks, handbags, key cases, umbrellas, purses; wallets; animal game bags, day packs; leashes for animals; tool pouches, sold empty; walking canes and sticks, toiletry kits sold empty; luggage tags; leather key chainsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jul 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 15, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance