Drawing for ROADVIEW

USPTO serial 78157123

ROADVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROADVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey L. Michelman

JEFFREY L MICHELMAN BLUMENFELD, KAPLAN & SANDWEISS, PC168 N MERAMEC AVE STE 400,ST LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009All portable, home, or mobile audio, video, home theater, and navigational products or systems of any nature, namely, radios; CD players and recorders; amplifiers and audio/video decoders; radios incorporating clocks; home stereos comprised of receivers, tuners, and speakers; boom boxes; audio cassette players and recorders; audio receivers; audio tuners; audio speakers; power inverters; liquid crystal displays; MP3 players and recorders; DVD players and recorders; televisions; video cassette players and recorders; global positioning satellite systems consisting of antenna, decoder, reader, processor, and monitor; set top interface boxes for reception and transmission of cable, satellite, and broadband signals; flat screen computer and video monitors; CD ROM players and receivers; WMA players and recorders; personal video recorders; and satellite receiversACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance