USPTO serial 78157333
MAXLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2930483Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2005
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAXLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milpitas, CA
Milpitas, CA
Milpitas, CA
SCOTTS VALLEY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam D. Trudell
MIRIAM D TRUDELL SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER MEMORY HARDWARE; COMPUTER DISK DRIVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maxtor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Maxtor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Maxtor Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MAXLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |