Drawing for VOSE & SONS

USPTO serial 78157550

VOSE & SONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOSE & SONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANK J. MCGUE

FRANK J MCGUE10801 N 32ND ST STE 5PHOENIX, AZ 85028UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015pianos, namely, upright pianos, grand pianos, and digital pianos; piano keyboard instrumentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 11, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 9, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 8, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 5, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 1, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 1, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 29, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 29, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 14, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2004PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance