Drawing for Serial No. 78158039

USPTO serial 78158039

Serial No. 78158039

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78158039?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. McClure

DANIEL R MCCLURE THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL100 GALLERIA PKWY NWSTE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing a web site whereby buyers of goods or services locate and receive quotations from multiple competitive sources and sellers of goods or services identify and bid on multiple new sales opportunities; import and export agencies; computerized database management; providing business marketing information via the Internet; integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions on a global computer network; sample distribution; dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; online retail store services featuring computer hardware and software and computer peripherals; computerized database management servicesACTIVE—
037Repair services for computing devices, computer hardware, and computer peripherals; repair services for computer network hardware and associated peripheral devices; repair services for telecommunication devices and electronic devices; repair services for amusement apparatus connected to television devices; maintenance computer networks and hardware; installation, maintenance and repair of computer networksACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of advertising material for others; streaming of audio and video material on the InternetACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture and construction of computing devices, computer hardware, and computer peripherals; custom manufacture and construction of computer network hardware and associated peripheral devices; custom manufacture and construction of telecommunication devices and electronic devices; custom manufacture and construction of amusement apparatus connected to television devicesACTIVE—
041Publication of books, magazines, and documentsACTIVE—
042Database development services; computer software consultation and design; computer programming for others; consulting services in the fields of design, selection; implementation and use of computer software systems for others; computer network design for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer infrastructure hosting services, namely renting computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and related operational and supporting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance