Drawing for QCI

USPTO serial 78158041

QCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. McClure

DANIEL R MCCLURE THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL100 GALLERIA PKWY NWSTE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Circuit boards, computer hardware, computer peripherals, PC cards, computer adaptors for connection to the Internet, monitors, batteries, computer battery chargers, keyboards, PDAs, computer software for data processing and data storage, computer hardware for computer network systems, digital cellular phones, internet phone, cellular phone battery chargers, specialty holsters for carrying cellular phones and pagers; CD drives for computers, video game machines for use with televisions; digital cameras, digital video cameras, televisions; communications software for use in connecting computer network usersACTIVE—
016Educational books featuring lessons and exercises about computer operations; news magazines, pictures, photographs, negotiable instrument forms, envelopes, writing paper, name card books, file folders, diaries, notebooks, printed instructional guides for the use of computers, posters, computer catalogues, memo notepadsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 21, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance