Drawing for QCI

USPTO serial 78158043

QCI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QCI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel R. McClure

DANIEL R MCCLURE THOMAS, KAYDEN HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL100 GALLERIA PKWY NWSTE 1750ATLANTA, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business services for providing product quotations, bidding, distribution services; import and export services; management services for computerized database; on-line services for providing business information; services for providing electronic business and commercial transaction; on-line retail services for computing devices, computer hardware and software, computer peripherals, computer network hardware and software, computing network peripherals and electronic devicesACTIVE—
037Repair services for computing devices, computer hardware, and computer peripherals; repair services for computer network hardware and associated peripheral devices; repair services for telecommunication devices and electronic devices; repair services for amusement apparatus connected to television devices; maintenance computer networks and hardware; installation, maintenance and repair of computer networksACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of advertising material for others; streaming of audio and video material on the InternetACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture and construction of computing devices, computer hardware, and computer peripherals; custom manufacture and construction of computer network hardware and associated peripheral devices; custom manufacture and construction of telecommunication devices and electronic devices; custom manufacture and construction of amusement apparatus connected to television devicesACTIVE—
041Publication of books, magazines, documents, and CD (compact discs) and DVD (digital versatile discs); on-line publication of books and magazinesACTIVE—
042Database development and management services; computer software consultation and design; computer programming for others; consulting services in the fields of design, selection, implementation and use of computer software systems for others; computer network design for others; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer infrastructure hosting services, namely renting computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals and related operational and supporting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 21, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 30, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 29, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance