USPTO serial 78158118
MILENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tokyo, 101-8441, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; processed meat; processed beans; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; eggs; milk; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; preparations for stew or bouillon; fermented bean; tofu; iced tofu; soybean milk; edible protein extracted from wheat or soybean; pre-cooked frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea; sugar; vinegar; sauces; sauces for noodles; treacle for food; honey; rice; flour for food; preparations made from cereals; noodles; pasta; boiled and dried noodles; pre-cooked frozen entrees consisting primarily of rice; sandwiches; bread; pastry; Japanese confectionery, namely, shiruko, instant shiruko, zenzai, and powdered zenzai; Western-style confectionery, namely, ice cream, cakes, Castella cakes, biscuits, pies, cookies, crackers, sherbets, sorbets, sponge cake; preparations for making instant cakes or cookies; cake mix; preparations for making ice cream; preparations for making sherbets; batter mix, namely, dry blend of flour, food starch, skim milk powder and egg powder; breader mix, namely flour based bread crumb or cracker meal; tempura batter mix, namely flour-based batter mix for making tempura; bread crumbs; curry | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Foodstuffs for animals; unprocessed grains; unprocessed cereals; unprocessed rice; unprocessed barley; plant seeds | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Soft drinks; fruit juices; vegetable juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing commercial sales information in the fields of foods, drinks and restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Providing information in the field of restaurants and other establishments serving food and drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named MILENA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |