Drawing for CENERGY

USPTO serial 78158494

CENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence H. Meier, Esq.

LAWRENCE H MEIER ESQ DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STBURLINGTON, VT 05401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring computer software for use in managing the operation of computer software and hardware; application services provider (ASP) featuring computer software forr managing financial, legal and physical asset information; application service provider (ASP) featuring computer software for the automatic collection of computer software and hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance