Drawing for DRIVE LIKE YOU'VE NEVER IMAGINED

USPTO serial 78158670

DRIVE LIKE YOU'VE NEVER IMAGINED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRIVE LIKE YOU'VE NEVER IMAGINED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHELE L. MCSHANE

MICHELE L MCSHANE MATTEL INC333 CONTINENTAL BLVDEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-5012UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, STUFFED TOY ANIMALS, TOY AIRPLANES, BALLOONS, SPORT BALLS, TOY BANKS, BATH TOYS, BEAN BAGS, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, PLAY WANDS, BUBBLE MAKING WAND AND SOLUTION SETS, CARD GAMES, CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF CRACKERS OR NOISEMAKERS, TOY MOBILES, FLYING DISCS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, ICE SKATES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, KITES, RIDE-ON TOYS, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, ROLLER SKATES, WATER-SQUIRTING TOYS, YO-YOS, ADULT AND CHILDREN PARTY GAMES, CHRISTMAS STOCKINGS, COLLECTIBLE TOY FIGURES, DRAWING TOYS, IN-LINE SKATES, PLAY TENTS, PLAY HOUSES, RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, SAND TOYS, SAND BOX TOYS, SLIDE PUZZLES, PADDLE BALL GAMES; SWIM GOGGLES, SWIM VESTS, BOARD GAMES; TOY VEHICLES; OUTDOOR PLAY EQUIPMENT, COIN-OPERATED ARCADE GAMES, ELECTRONIC HAND-HELD GAMES, PLASTIC TOY HOOPS, PINWHEELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance