USPTO serial 78158812
THE PRANA STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PRANA STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Drucker
KEVIN M DRUCKER HAYES SOLOWAY PC130 W CUSHING STTUCSON, AZ 85701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Yoga, reiki, stress management and polarity instruction; conducting workshops and seminars in personal and self awareness; educational services, namely, conducting programs in the field of yoga, reiki, polarity, stress management and health; personal trainer services; strength and conditioning training; physical education services; physical fitness and stress management consultation and instruction; providing fitness and exercise facilities; publication of books, brochures, leaflets, textbooks and manuals regarding yoga, reiki, stress management, polarity, exercise and physical fitness. | ACTIVE | Jun 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |