USPTO serial 78158992
WHY NOT?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY NOT??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL M. CISLO
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded media, namely pre-recorded audio tapes, video tapes, compact discs, digital audio and video discs, DVD's, interactive compact discs and software and featuring instruction in aerobics, dieting, exercise, fighting, martial arts, motivational teaching, health and fitness, nutrition, personal motivation, self-defense and weight control | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed materials, namely books, course materials, and instructional and training materials in the fields of aerobics, exercise, diet, fighting, health and fitness, martial arts, motivational teaching, nutrition and self-defense; catalogues in the field of aerobics, exercise, diet, fighting, nutrition, health and fitness, martial arts, motivational teaching, and self-defense; certificates; cookbooks; photographs; posters; and stationery | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of motivational teaching, aerobics, exercise, diet, fighting, health and fitness, martial arts, motivational teaching, nutrition and self-defense | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WHY NOT ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WHY NOT ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHY NOT?
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |