USPTO serial 78159053
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly M. Ford
HOLLY M FORD BUCHANAN, INGERSOLL & ROONEY1737 KING ST STE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-2727UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |