Drawing for AQUADA

USPTO serial 78159254

AQUADA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AQUADA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew R. Basile, Registration No. 24,753

Andrew R. Basile, Registration No. 24,753 YOUNG & BASILE, P.C.3001 W. BIG BEAVER RD., STE. 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land and marine vehicles; namely, motorized wheeled vehicles for use on land which are also capable of travel on water, and replacement service parts and fittings and accessories therefor, namely, loose seat covers shaped for vehicle seats, anti-theft alarms for vehicles; children's car safety seats; fitted vehicle covers; seat covers for vehiclesACTIVE—
028TOY VEHICLES, NAMELY, RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, INFLATABLE TOYS IN THE FORM OF VEHICLES, BATH TOYS, SLOT RACING CARS, AND ELECTRICALLY OPERATED TOY VEHICLES; TOY MODEL HOBBY CRAFT KITS; TOY MODEL VEHICLES; TOY MODEL VEHICLES AND RELATED ACCESSORIES SOLD AS A UNIT; COLLECTOR MODEL VEHICLES, FINE SCALE MODEL VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 16, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 15, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2006ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 29, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 27, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 28, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Sep 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance