Drawing for EMA

USPTO serial 78159329

EMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chad S. Hilyard

CHAD S HILYARD TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR EIGHTH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PERSONNEL RECRUITMENTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 24, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 24, 2004EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 19, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance