USPTO serial 78159591
PROTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD D. CLARKE
RICHARD D CLARKE LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD D. CLARKE3755 AVOCADO BLVD #1000LA MESA, CA 91941-7301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, HATS, BEANIES, VISORS, JACKETS, ATHLETIC JERSEYS AND ATHLETIC | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | PAINTBALL GUNS AND PARTS, NAMELY, GUN BARRELS, FITTINGS, GRIPS, TRIGGERS, FIRING MECHANISMS, LOADING MECHANISMS, FRAMES, STOCKS, TELESCOPIC SIGHTS, NON-TELESCOPIC SIGHTS AND RELATED SIGHTING MECHANISMS, AND AMMUNITION PODS FOR CARRYING PAINTBALLS, CARRYING PACKS FOR CARRYING AMMUNITION PODS CONTAINING PAINTBALLS, ATHLETIC PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, PADDED JERSEYS AND PADDED PANTS, PROTECTIVE GLOVES, HIP AND KNEE PADS, FACE MASKS AND GOGGLES FOR USE IN PAINTBALL GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |