USPTO serial 78159691
MUSICMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUSICMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Rogers
DAVID ROGERS ROGERS LAW OFFICESTE 301 ST CLAIR CTR2 ST CLAIR AVE ETORONTO, ON M4T 2T5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | radios | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |