USPTO serial 78159728
EEYORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EEYORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Ackerman
STEVE ACKERMAN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes and compact discs featuring music, stories, games and activities; pre-recorded video cassettes; laser video discs; digital video discs and digital versatile discs featuring movies, music, games and animated entertainment; CD-ROM discs, computer game programs and computer software featuring learning activities, games, and entertainment; motion picture films; eyeglasses and sunglasses; consumer electronic goods, namely, portable compact disc players, portable digital compact disc players, portable solid state digital devices, TV/DVD combination devices, TV/VCR combination devices, TV/DVD/VCR combination devices, DVD players, VCR recorder/players, DVD/VCR combination players, television sets, desktop personal computers, portable personal computers, convergent TV/PC units, handheld computers, 2-way pagers, portable radios, walkie-talkies, cordless telephones, telephones, still cameras, video cameras, non-tethered still digital cameras, non-tethered video cameras, video game consoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |