USPTO serial 78159732
POOH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POOH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Ackerman
STEVE ACKERMAN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production of television and radio programs; entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of comedy and animation; entertainment services in the nature of on-going television programs, namely, animated interactive television programs for children; distribution of television and radio programs for others; rental of videotapes of television programs; rental of sound recordings of radio programs; production, distribution and rental of motion picture films; presentation of motion picture films, namely, in motion picture theaters; production of sound and video recordings; rental of sound and video recordings; providing information via the Internet in the fields of games, music, activities and movies for children; entertainment in the nature of theater productions; amusement park and theme park services; entertainment services in the nature of a live amusement park show and performances by costumed characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |