USPTO serial 78159756
POOH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POOH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Ackerman
STEVE ACKERMAN THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bathing suits; beachwear; belts; cloth bibs for babies and infants; underwear; sweaters; Halloween masquerade costumes; dresses; gloves; hats; hosiery; infant wear; jackets; mittens; pajamas; pants; sweat pants; shoes; shorts; children's pajamas, namely, sleepers; socks; T-shirts; tank tops; tights; vests; jerseys; scarves; neckties; robes; night shirts; night gowns; head bands; wrist bands; shirts; coats; leotards; leg warmers; stockings; panty hose; athletic shoes; slippers; boots; sandals and rainwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |