Drawing for STEEL TECH

USPTO serial 78160185

STEEL TECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEEL TECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry L. Saret

LARRY L SARET MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLC401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1900CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028stuffed toys; plush toys; bath toys; water squirting toys; soft sculpture toys; vinyl soft sculpture squeezable squeaker toys; multiple activity toys with or without electronic sounds; wind-up toys and parts thereof; mechanically-, electrically- or battery-operated die cast or plastic toy vehicles, namely, cars, motorcycles, trains, locomotives, airplanes, helicopters and boats; musical toys; TV/clock toys; toy tool sets; wooden toys, namely wooden activity toys; wooden push/pull toys; toy drawing boards; toy action figures; two- and three-dimensional manipulative puzzles; mobiles for children; children's toy figures and play sets therefor; children's role play sets, namely doctor sets, construction play sets, police play sets, and fire fighter play sets; toy model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; railways and car race sets; radio control and remote control cars; construction block toys; games, namely hand-held units and table-top units for playing electronic games; plastic action skill games, manipulative games and drawing gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance