USPTO serial 78160409
VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3356994Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Augustin de Desmaures, CA
SAINT-AUGUSTIN-DE-DESMAURES, CA
SAINT-AUGUSTIN-DE-DESMAURES, CA
SAINT-AUGUSTIN-DE-DESMAURES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julia K. Sutherland
Julia K. Sutherland Seyfarth Shaw LLP131 S. Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Mecatronic system comprised of specialized mechanical system, specialized electronic board and specialized artificial intelligence algorithms for the purposes of improving the quality of life of persons suffering from physical dysfunctions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by société victhom corporation
- Other trademarks owned by VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VICTHOM HUMAN BIONICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |