USPTO serial 78160655
SURF 'N SAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURF 'N SAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
Stephen J. Strauss Fulwider Patton Lee & Utecht, LLP6060 Center Drive 10th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SPORT SHIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, COATS, PANTS, DRESSES, SWEATERS, PULLOVERS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, MUU MUU, SCARVES, BELTS, PAJAMAS, NIGHTGOWNS, NEGLIGEES, LINGERIES, DRESSING GOWNS, ROBES, SWIMWEAR, BATHING SUIT COVERUPS SCARVES, HOSIERY, UNDERWEAR, BRAS, HATS, CAPS, SOCKS, SHOES, BOOTS, AND SANDALS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |