USPTO serial 78161185
MEDIA PORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIA PORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTING SOFTWARE THAT PROVIDES THE INTERFACE BETWEEN TWO OR MORE COMPUTING DEVICES, ELECTRONIC DEVICES, ELECTRICAL DEVICES, OR DEVICES THAT CAN OR CAN BE MADE TO COMMUNICATE ELECTRONICALLY, PROVIDING THE INTERFACE INCLUDING ANALYZING DATA COMMUNICATED BY SUCH DEVICES OVER A COMPUTER NETWORK TO DETERMINE AN APPROPRIATE ACTION BASED ON THE RECEIVED DATA,APPROPRIATE RESPONSES INCLUDING DELIVERING CONTEXT SENSITIVE MULTI-MEDIA CONTENT, INCLUDING FULL MOTION VIDEO AND/OR AUDIO, TO PRE-DETERMINED USER INTERFACES, AND THE INTERFACE INCLUDING TRACKING AND REPORTING INCIDENTS AS COMMUNICATED IN THE RECEIVED DATA | ACTIVE | Jun 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |