USPTO serial 78161450
TIN ROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIN ROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Geyserville, CA
Geyserville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Frohling
DANIEL D. FROHLING LOEB & LOEB LLP321 NORTH CLARK STREETSUITE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |