USPTO serial 78161753
CHILLY DAWGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2983813Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHILLY DAWGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael L. Diaz
Michael L. Diaz MICHAEL L. DIAZ, P.C.555 REPUBLIC DRIVE, SUITE 200PLANO, TX 75074UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Animal foodstuffs; edible cat treats; cat food; dog biscuits; dog food; edible dog treats; edible chews for animals; pet food; and pet beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUFF LIFE, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Teresa A. Aguilar
- Other trademarks owned by Teresa A. Aguilar
- Other trademarks owned by Teresa A. Aguilar
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named CHILLY DAWGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |