USPTO serial 78161876
RODEO ROUNDUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RODEO ROUNDUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
02150 Espoo, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Weisbein
KARIN SEGALL DARBY & DARBY, PCP O BOX 5257,NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE FOR COMMUNICATION DEVICES; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS ENABLING USERS TO PLAY GAMES WITH MOBILE PHONES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS ENABLING USERS OF COMMUNICATION DEVICES TO SIMULTANEOUSLY ACCESS DATABASES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; SOFTWARE ENABLING TRANSFER OF DATA BETWEEN MOBILE COMMUNICATION APPARATUS; VIRTUAL REALITY GAME SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES; HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES, ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT WITH A WATCH FUNCTION; EQUIPMENT PACKAGED AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING BOARD GAMES, PUZZLES, REMOTE CONTROL TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, PROVIDING COMPUTER GAMES TO MOBILE PHONES AND COMPUTERS; PROVIDING ONLINE COMPUTER GAMES VIA NETWORK BETWEEN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS AND COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |