USPTO serial 78161969
HEALTH LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEALTH LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. McKee
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVESEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | house mark for a full line of pharmaceutical products, namely, vitamins,supplements, meal replacement drinks, and mineral supplements; meal replacement bars; herbal and non-medicinal beauty care products and health aids | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | house mark for a full line of prerecorded compact discs, cassettes, and audio and videotapes regarding nutrition and positive life styles | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | house mark for a full line of orthopedic supplies, health care supplies, infrared diode pain relief therapy equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | house mark for a full line of printed publications regarding nutrition and positive life | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | house mark for a full line of men's, women's and children's clothing,headwear, and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | house mark for a full line of health foods and beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | house mark for a full line of education, informational and entertainment services relating to nutrition and life style choices | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | house mark for a full line of sports injury and rehabilitative services,veterinary services, and infrared diode pain relief therapy services; operation of sports injury and physical rehabilitation clinics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 148977 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HEALTH LITE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |