USPTO serial 78162216
EEYORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EEYORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven Plotkin
Steven Plotkin The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0643Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production and distribution of television programs, radio programs and motion picture films; production of audio and video tapes; production and distribution of cable television programs; entertainment in the nature of on-going satellite television programs and radio programs in the field of stories, music and entertainment for children; production of sound recordings; production and distribution of interactive television programs, namely animated interactive television programs for children; rental of videotapes featuring television programs, sound recordings and motion picture films; production of video discs, video cassettes and videotapes; multimedia entertainment software production services; providing information via the Internet in the fields of games, music, activities and movies for children; presentation of motion picture films, namely, in motion picture theaters; entertainment in the nature of theater productions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |