USPTO serial 78162499
COOGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
Coogi Nominees Pty Ltd (Administrators appointed)
Abbotsford, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by Coogi Nominees Pty Ltd (Administrators appointed)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. COX
WILLIAM H COX JANVEY GORDON HERLANDS ET AL355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches, watchbands and straps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COOGI PARTNERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COOGI PARTNERS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Coogi Nominees Pty Ltd (Administrators appointed)
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named COOGI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |