USPTO serial 78163002
MB ITALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MB ITALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hermosa Beach, CA
Hermosa Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irene M. Guimera
IRENE M GUIMERA GUIMERA & GUIMERASTE 210 1600 ROSECRANS AVEMANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266-3708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | MOTOR VEHICLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WHEELS, WHEEL PARTS AND ASSEMBLIES, NAMELY, LUG NUTS, WHEEL NUTS, WHEEL COVERS, HUB CAPS, CENTER CAPS, WHEEL COVER SHIELDS, HUB CUP SHIELDS, VALVE STEMS, WHEEL LOCKS, SPINNERS, SPACERS, STUDS; STEERING WHEELS; VEHICLE STRUCTURAL PARTS, NAMELY, SPOILERS, SIDE SKIRTS, REAR WINGS; SUSPENSION SPRINGS, SHOCK ABSORBERS, KNOBS | ABANDONED | Nov 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |