Drawing for LEXEL

USPTO serial 78163023

LEXEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEXEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Programmable voltage-driven metal array on a computer chip designed to generate arbitrary electric fields based on a regular pattern of electric field elements, for use in biotechnology, medical and life science industries.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Feb 2, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Feb 1, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Aug 12, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 2, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance